Comments on: Sir William Jones: getting lucky http://ohuiginn.blogsome.com/2005/04/13/sir-william-jones-getting-lucky/ 0 Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:34:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha by: H.J. Klein http://ohuiginn.blogsome.com/2005/04/13/sir-william-jones-getting-lucky/#comment-38 Thu, 03 Apr 2008 03:47:33 +0100 http://ohuiginn.blogsome.com/2005/04/13/sir-william-jones-getting-lucky/#comment-38 Jones was scholarly although others noticed language family similarities as well. His work is of tremendous importance in language studies and the law. There is even more on language following the first paragraph. Neither Jones nor others at the time knew what we do today about anthropology. He contributed to the content of comparative linguistics and historical linguistics although not in methodology. Anthropological linguistics came way later. Jones was scholarly although others noticed language family similarities as well. His work is of tremendous importance in language studies and the law. There is even more on language following the first paragraph.

Neither Jones nor others at the time
knew what we do today about anthropology. He contributed to the content of comparative linguistics and historical linguistics although not in methodology. Anthropological linguistics came way later.

]]> by: testanchor58 http://ohuiginn.blogsome.com/2005/04/13/sir-william-jones-getting-lucky/#comment-9 Sun, 16 Oct 2005 05:31:52 +0100 http://ohuiginn.blogsome.com/2005/04/13/sir-william-jones-getting-lucky/#comment-9 testcomment780 testcomment780

]]>